People always have this misconception on environmentalist and naturalist and whatever gempak name for people caring for the 'mother earth'. Before arguing or saying anything, i wanna dispel this phrase first, the "saving mother earth" or "mother nature" or yada yada.. That 'mother' of us, the earth, doesn't need any saving from us. If u wanna litter, go ahead.. use CFCs.. you're welcomed to.. cause global warming?? Owhh.. please do.. If we look at earth, global warming and the extinction of mankind would be quite an insignificant event for our Mother Nature since she has already wiped a whole bunch of other beings on this god forsaken planet. Mother nature heals herself, even after a meteor explosion and global damnation she turned out okay. Ice cold age?? She passed that like a Disney's on ice event. Exhaustion of fossil fuels? Damn she'll rot us and make a new batch of it... Even now as we speak that mother of ours is still wrecking havoc and having fun with it. Don't believe me? Switch on and go watch Violent Earth and tell me that it isn't so.. xD Well next time a person come to you preaching about saving mother earth, tell the bugger to get their facts right. That we're the ones who need the saving, hence we're making a move in saving the environment. Saving this tolerable environment for us to live on. It has nothing to do with saving the pandas in China, saving the whale, saving whatever animal we can think of.. it's all about making sure the temperature is tolerable, the resource is enough, the oxygen is sufficient and prolonging our stay here from the inevitable (the total damnation of humankind). But sometimes, i feel that we're just like a batch of bacteria on this planet, terrorizing and multiplying.. Which side should we choose then? Mother earth? Humankind?